Government of Gujarat vs KASUPUSAMI @ KANAN NOSS AKKAMMUTEAR — 2134/2021

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1)A,11(1)D,11(1)H,11(1)E,11(1)K. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD030025502021

Filing Number

2134/2021

Filing Date

08-Oct-2021

Registration No

2134/2021

Registration Date

08-Oct-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, KARJAN

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2105

Police Station

KARJAN POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1)A,11(1)D,11(1)H,11(1)E,11(1)K
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASUPUSAMI @ KANAN NOSS AKKAMMUTEAR

  2. 2.VIGNESHWARAN SONEMUTHU AKKAMMUTEAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Kasupusami & Vigneshwaran (CC 2134/2021) Decision: The court acquitted the two respondents of animal cruelty charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant alleged that the defendants transported 10 cattle in an Isuzu truck without proper permits or facilities (no food, water, or space for movement), the prosecution failed to produce concrete corroborative evidence. The court found gaps in the evidence: no veterinary certificates confirming animal suffering, no photographs documenting cruelty, no independent eyewitness testimony, and procedural deficiencies in the panchnama (official record). The benefit of doubt was given to the accused under CrPC Section 313. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 04-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 07-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 07-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 03-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 24-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 14-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 14-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 11-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 09-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 28-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 28-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 19-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 05-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 23-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 14-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 25-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 04-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 14-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 31-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 20-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 03-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 25-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 09-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 02-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 17-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  41. 06-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  42. 01-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  43. 20-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  44. 29-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  45. 17-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  46. 15-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  47. 23-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  48. 23-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 08-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2134/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Kasupusami & Vigneshwaran (CC 2134/2021) Decision: The court acquitted the two respondents of animal cruelty charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant alleged that the defendants transported 10 cattle in an Isuzu truck without proper permits or facilities (no food, water, or space for movement), the prosecution failed to produce concrete corroborative evidence. The court found gaps in the evidence: no veterinary certificates confirming animal suffering, no photographs documenting cruelty, no independent eyewitness testimony, and procedural deficiencies in the panchnama (official record). The benefit of doubt was given to the accused under CrPC Section 313. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case