RAHUL URPHE SAHUN HARUN MEV(MUSLIM) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 83/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJVD030006002026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
83/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KARJAN
Judge
4-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11197025251239
Police Station
KARJAN POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL URPHE SAHUN HARUN MEV(MUSLIM)
Adv. J M SAIYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
SUMMARY In this bail petition (CR.M.A. No. 83/2026), the court rejected the petitioner's application for release on bail. The accused was charged under IPC sections 65(a), 65(i), 88(2), 81, and 83 for offenses related to illicit liquor smuggling, including possession of foreign beer, liquor bottles, and contraband materials valued at approximately ₹43,96,420. The court found that given the serious nature of drug-related crimes, the pattern of offenses in Gujarat, and the public interest in controlling such criminal activity, bail could not be granted as the circumstances did not warrant leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2026
SUMMARY In this bail petition (CR.M.A. No. 83/2026), the court rejected the petitioner's application for release on bail. The accused was charged under IPC sections 65(a), 65(i), 88(2), 81, and 83 for offenses related to illicit liquor smuggling, including possession of foreign beer, liquor bottles, and contraband materials valued at approximately ₹43,96,420. The court found that given the serious nature of drug-related crimes, the pattern of offenses in Gujarat, and the public interest in controlling such criminal activity, bail could not be granted as the circumstances did not warrant leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts