Government of Gujarat vs JAYSHANKAR S/O GOPAL GAUD Advocate - G M PATEL — 4584/2003

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJVD030002242003

Filing Number

4584/2003

Filing Date

14-Aug-2003

Registration No

4584/2003

Registration Date

14-Aug-2003

Court

TALUKA COURT, KARJAN

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

I 48

Police Station

KARJAN POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT

Year

2003

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184
Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYSHANKAR S/O GOPAL GAUD Advocate - G M PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Jayshankar (Criminal Case 4584/2003) The court acquitted the accused Jayshankar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 in connection with a 2003 road accident. Despite evidence of a collision between a luxury bus and truck resulting in two deaths, the court found the prosecution failed to establish the accused's criminal negligence or rash driving beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient evidence linking the accused's conduct directly to the fatalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 16-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 23-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 09-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 02-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 01-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 03-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 03-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 24-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  33. 28-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  34. 28-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  35. 28-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  36. 28-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  37. 29-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  38. 01-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  39. 07-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  40. 02-Jan-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  41. 05-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  42. 07-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  43. 11-Apr-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  44. 09-Jan-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  45. 11-Oct-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  46. 13-Jul-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  47. 20-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  48. 22-Jan-2018

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  49. 04-Dec-2017

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  50. 03-Oct-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  51. 19-Aug-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  52. 27-Jun-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  53. 28-Mar-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal ( Ad-Hoc) CIVIL Judge

  54. 16-Jan-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal ( Ad-Hoc) CIVIL Judge

  55. 03-Dec-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal ( Ad-Hoc) CIVIL Judge

  56. 13-Sep-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal ( Ad-Hoc) CIVIL Judge

  57. 10-Jun-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 07-Apr-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 27-Nov-2015

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 09-Sep-2015

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 02-Jul-2015

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 30-Apr-2015

    Process To Accused

  63. 02-Mar-2015

    Process To Accused

  64. 22-Dec-2014

    Process To Accused

  65. 03-Nov-2014

    Process To Accused

  66. 08-Sep-2014

    Process To Accused

  67. 17-Jul-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  68. 30-Jun-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  69. 27-May-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  70. 16-Apr-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  71. 18-Feb-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  72. 01-Jan-2014

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  73. 18-Nov-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  74. 23-Sep-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  75. 05-Aug-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  76. 26-Jun-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  77. 13-May-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  78. 18-Mar-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  79. 04-Feb-2013

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  80. 12-Dec-2012

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  81. 22-Oct-2012

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  82. 03-Sep-2012

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  83. 11-Jul-2012

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  84. 05-Apr-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  85. 14-Aug-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4584/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Jayshankar (Criminal Case 4584/2003) The court acquitted the accused Jayshankar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 in connection with a 2003 road accident. Despite evidence of a collision between a luxury bus and truck resulting in two deaths, the court found the prosecution failed to establish the accused's criminal negligence or rash driving beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient evidence linking the accused's conduct directly to the fatalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case