RAMESHBHAI BABUBHAI PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 631/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIM. MISC. APP. - SESSIONS

CNR: GJVD010015472026

Filing Number

631/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

631/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT VADODARA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

146

Police Station

GOTRI POLICE STATION - VADODARA DISTRICT

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2)
Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI BABUBHAI PATEL

    Adv. B R MACHHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Vadodara allowed Rameshbhai Patel's application to modify his anticipatory bail conditions in fraud and criminal breach of trust charges (IPC §406, 420, 114). The court relaxed the restriction from "not leaving Gujarat state" to "not leaving India" without prior permission, recognizing that Patel's land development business requires inter-state travel and his relatives reside outside Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 631/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Vadodara allowed Rameshbhai Patel's application to modify his anticipatory bail conditions in fraud and criminal breach of trust charges (IPC §406, 420, 114). The court relaxed the restriction from "not leaving Gujarat state" to "not leaving India" without prior permission, recognizing that Patel's land development business requires inter-state travel and his relatives reside outside Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case