Government of Gujarat vs LALSINGBHAI ZULIYABHAI KONKANI Advocate - A N PATEL — 94/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP070001042026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1126
Police Station
DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LALSINGBHAI ZULIYABHAI KONKANI Advocate - A N PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Lalsing Juliya Konakni of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65 A-A) for alleged possession of 5 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹1,000. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide credible corroborating evidence—the panchnama (official record) lacked independent witnesses, police witnesses contradicted statements, and the seized sample was never chemically tested, creating reasonable doubt about the crime. The accused was ordered acquitted and discharged as the prosecution did not conclusively prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Lalsing Juliya Konakni of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65 A-A) for alleged possession of 5 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹1,000. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide credible corroborating evidence—the panchnama (official record) lacked independent witnesses, police witnesses contradicted statements, and the seized sample was never chemically tested, creating reasonable doubt about the crime. The accused was ordered acquitted and discharged as the prosecution did not conclusively prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts