Government of Gujarat vs ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI — 92/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP070001022026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1086
Police Station
DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2026
Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts