Government of Gujarat vs ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI — 92/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP070001022026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2026

Filing Number

92/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1086

Police Station

DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case