Government of Gujarat vs ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI — 92/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP070001022026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1086
Police Station
DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHABEN MUKESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court acquitted the accused, Ashaaben Mukeshbhai Chaudhuri, of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a). The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including unreliable witness testimonies, lack of proper documentation, and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that the panchnama (seizure record) lacked credibility and the prosecution could not prove the alleged seizure of contraband alcohol from the accused's premises on 18-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts