Government of Gujarat vs NAVINBHAI RAMANBHAI GAMIT Advocate - A N PATEL — 90/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP070001002026

e-Filing Number

05-01-2026

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1123

Police Station

DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVINBHAI RAMANBHAI GAMIT Advocate - A N PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Navinbhai Ramanbhai Gamit, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65 A-A. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical deficiencies: the panch (witness) records lacked proper authentication, the police witnesses could not credibly corroborate the seizure of 3 liters of illicit liquor, and the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to prove the offense conclusively. The court emphasized that mere suspicion cannot substitute for concrete proof in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Navinbhai Ramanbhai Gamit, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65 A-A. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical deficiencies: the panch (witness) records lacked proper authentication, the police witnesses could not credibly corroborate the seizure of 3 liters of illicit liquor, and the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to prove the offense conclusively. The court emphasized that mere suspicion cannot substitute for concrete proof in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case