Government of Gujarat vs PRAVINBHAI KANUSINGBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI — 88/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A,A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP070000982026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
88/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
88/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DOLVAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1089
Police Station
DOLVAN POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAVINBHAI KANUSINGBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - S R CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Pravinbhai Kanusinh Chaudhari, of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65), finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that critical procedural deficiencies—including the absence of proper panchnama (official record), lack of independent witnesses, and reliance solely on police witnesses—undermined the credibility of the seized contraband evidence and prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Pravinbhai Kanusinh Chaudhari, of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65), finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that critical procedural deficiencies—including the absence of proper panchnama (official record), lack of independent witnesses, and reliance solely on police witnesses—undermined the credibility of the seized contraband evidence and prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts