Government of Gujarat vs SUDHIRBHAI VIGNAYBHAI GAMIT Advocate - C M GAMIT — 3930/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060044472025

Filing Number

3930/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

3930/2025

Registration Date

02-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252088

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIRBHAI VIGNAYBHAI GAMIT Advocate - C M GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Songarh Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with 7 days imprisonment as alternative punishment, showing leniency while upholding rehabilitation principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3930/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Songarh Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and voluntary plea, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with 7 days imprisonment as alternative punishment, showing leniency while upholding rehabilitation principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case