Government of Gujarat vs NILESHBHAI URFE TAISAN RAMANBHAI KONKANI Advocate - G G VASAVA — 3358/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060037232025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3358/2025
Filing Date
06-09-2025
Registration No
3358/2025
Registration Date
06-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004251329
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NILESHBHAI URFE TAISAN RAMANBHAI KONKANI Advocate - G G VASAVA
AYUBBHAI BABUBHAI GAMIT
Adv. G G VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted two accused persons (Nilesh Urf Taison Ramanbhai Konkani and Ayubhai Babubhai Gamit) charged under the Gambling Act Section 12. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of gambling activity at a public place in Songadh on 26 May 2025, the case relied heavily on police witnesses and panch (witness) statements that were subsequently recalled, making corroboration insufficient. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as independent evidence to support the allegations was lacking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted two accused persons (Nilesh Urf Taison Ramanbhai Konkani and Ayubhai Babubhai Gamit) charged under the Gambling Act Section 12. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of gambling activity at a public place in Songadh on 26 May 2025, the case relied heavily on police witnesses and panch (witness) statements that were subsequently recalled, making corroboration insufficient. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as independent evidence to support the allegations was lacking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts