Government of Gujarat vs ROHANBHAI RITESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - D S GAMIT — 3342/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060037082025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3342/2025
Filing Date
06-09-2025
Registration No
3342/2025
Registration Date
06-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004251128
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ROHANBHAI RITESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - D S GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 28-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 08-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 03-11-2025 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185, finding him guilty of committing the offense. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of law, while emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185, finding him guilty of committing the offense. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of law, while emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts