Government of Gujarat vs ROHANBHAI RITESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - D S GAMIT — 3342/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060037082025
Filing Number
3342/2025
Filing Date
06-Sep-2025
Registration No
3342/2025
Registration Date
06-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004251128
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROHANBHAI RITESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - D S GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185, finding him guilty of committing the offense. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of law, while emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3342/2025
The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185, finding him guilty of committing the offense. The court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of law, while emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts