Government of Gujarat vs AFAJALBHAI AMIRBHAI SHEKH Advocate - A S GAMIT — 2802/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060031622025
Filing Number
2802/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
2802/2025
Registration Date
18-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824005250362
Police Station
UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AFAJALBHAI AMIRBHAI SHEKH Advocate - A S GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Songarh First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 275, 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177, 184 for rash or negligent driving. The court imposed a total fine of ₹700 (₹500 + ₹100 + ₹100) with seven days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment, considering the accused's poor economic condition, dependents, and the reformative purposes of sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2802/2025
Summary: The Songarh First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 275, 281 and MV Act Sections 3, 181, 177, 184 for rash or negligent driving. The court imposed a total fine of ₹700 (₹500 + ₹100 + ₹100) with seven days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment, considering the accused's poor economic condition, dependents, and the reformative purposes of sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts