JAMABHAI ISHARIYABHAI @ ICHCHHIYABHAI GAMIT vs BHUPENDRABHAI BAABLABHAI GAMIT Advocate - N S PRADHAN — 20/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP060026892024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

20/2024

Filing Date

15-06-2024

Registration No

20/2024

Registration Date

15-06-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

JAMABHAI ISHARIYABHAI @ ICHCHHIYABHAI GAMIT

Adv. R N DESAI

Respondent(s)

BHUPENDRABHAI BAABLABHAI GAMIT Advocate - N S PRADHAN

RANJANBEN D/O BAABLABHAI ISHARIYABHAI GAMIT AND W/O LAXMANBHAI GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

05-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

08-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

05-12-2025

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

06-11-2025

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

Interim Orders

08-01-2026
ORDER

Summary This is a Gujarati civil suit (R.C.S. No. 20/24) decided by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) at Songadh on January 8, 2026. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for mandatory injunction (RCS-5) and restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land while permitting the case to proceed to final determination. The court found the plaintiff established primary ownership and rightful possession of the disputed land based on revenue records and sale deeds, and granted relief against the defendants' trespass and unauthorized interference with cultivation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Gujarati civil suit (R.C.S. No. 20/24) decided by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) at Songadh on January 8, 2026. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for mandatory injunction (RCS-5) and restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land while permitting the case to proceed to final determination. The court found the plaintiff established primary ownership and rightful possession of the disputed land based on revenue records and sale deeds, and granted relief against the defendants' trespass and unauthorized interference with cultivation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case