JAMABHAI ISHARIYABHAI @ ICHCHHIYABHAI GAMIT vs BHUPENDRABHAI BAABLABHAI GAMIT Advocate - N S PRADHAN — 20/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP060026892024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2024
Filing Date
15-06-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
15-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAMABHAI ISHARIYABHAI @ ICHCHHIYABHAI GAMIT
Adv. R N DESAI
Respondent(s)
BHUPENDRABHAI BAABLABHAI GAMIT Advocate - N S PRADHAN
RANJANBEN D/O BAABLABHAI ISHARIYABHAI GAMIT AND W/O LAXMANBHAI GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-12-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 06-11-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Gujarati civil suit (R.C.S. No. 20/24) decided by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) at Songadh on January 8, 2026. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for mandatory injunction (RCS-5) and restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land while permitting the case to proceed to final determination. The court found the plaintiff established primary ownership and rightful possession of the disputed land based on revenue records and sale deeds, and granted relief against the defendants' trespass and unauthorized interference with cultivation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Gujarati civil suit (R.C.S. No. 20/24) decided by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) at Songadh on January 8, 2026. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for mandatory injunction (RCS-5) and restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land while permitting the case to proceed to final determination. The court found the plaintiff established primary ownership and rightful possession of the disputed land based on revenue records and sale deeds, and granted relief against the defendants' trespass and unauthorized interference with cultivation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts