Government of Gujarat vs PIYUSHKUMAR RAMKRISHNABHAI RAM — 930/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060010072026

Filing Number

930/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

930/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252832

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.PIYUSHKUMAR RAMKRISHNABHAI RAM

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting guilt (similar to "Alford plea" principles) while maintaining his presumption of innocence. The court sentenced him to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, reducing the potential maximum punishment, and noted that such arrangements can be accepted within existing plea bargaining framework while ensuring judicial oversight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 930/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting guilt (similar to "Alford plea" principles) while maintaining his presumption of innocence. The court sentenced him to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, reducing the potential maximum punishment, and noted that such arrangements can be accepted within existing plea bargaining framework while ensuring judicial oversight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.