Government of Gujarat vs DANIYELBHAI BALUBHAI GAMIT Advocate - G V VASAVA — 914/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009912026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
914/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
914/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004252563
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DANIYELBHAI BALUBHAI GAMIT Advocate - G V VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat High Court approved the accused's plea bargaining application under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing conviction without admission of guilt while maintaining innocence—a concept modeled on the "Alford plea" recognized in US jurisprudence. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment already undergone and a fine of Rs. 500, considering the socio-economic circumstances and the non-heinous nature of the offense, while directing the court to explore feasibility of incorporating such "mutually satisfactory disposition" provisions within existing legal frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court approved the accused's plea bargaining application under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing conviction without admission of guilt while maintaining innocence—a concept modeled on the "Alford plea" recognized in US jurisprudence. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment already undergone and a fine of Rs. 500, considering the socio-economic circumstances and the non-heinous nature of the offense, while directing the court to explore feasibility of incorporating such "mutually satisfactory disposition" provisions within existing legal frameworks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts