Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - H R RANA — 905/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009802026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
905/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
905/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004253010
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - H R RANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500. The court imposed this lenient sentence considering the accused's poverty, responsibility for dependents, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, while accepting the accused's guilty plea and demonstrating remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500. The court imposed this lenient sentence considering the accused's poverty, responsibility for dependents, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, while accepting the accused's guilty plea and demonstrating remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts