Government of Gujarat vs KALPESHBHAI GAMANABHAI GAMIT Advocate - A A GAMIT — 904/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009792026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
904/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
904/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004253086
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALPESHBHAI GAMANABHAI GAMIT Advocate - A A GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265-290, allowing the accused to accept conviction while maintaining innocence (similar to Alford plea principles) and imposing a suspended sentence of 6 months with a Rs. 500 fine. The court emphasized that this "mutually satisfactory disposition" was appropriate given the case's nature, the accused's age, and social-economic circumstances, while noting such pleas require judicial oversight to ensure fairness and victim consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265-290, allowing the accused to accept conviction while maintaining innocence (similar to Alford plea principles) and imposing a suspended sentence of 6 months with a Rs. 500 fine. The court emphasized that this "mutually satisfactory disposition" was appropriate given the case's nature, the accused's age, and social-economic circumstances, while noting such pleas require judicial oversight to ensure fairness and victim consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts