Government of Gujarat vs NITISHKUMAR MONAHARBHAI VASAVA — 902/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009772026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
902/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
902/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004253066
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NITISHKUMAR MONAHARBHAI VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under IPC Section 265C and CrPC Section 290. The accused was convicted without admitting guilt and sentenced to six months imprisonment with a ₹500 fine, with credit for time served. The court emphasized that the plea bargaining was based on a "mutually satisfactory disposition" agreed upon by all parties, and the accused's presumption of innocence regarding the charged offense was preserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under IPC Section 265C and CrPC Section 290. The accused was convicted without admitting guilt and sentenced to six months imprisonment with a ₹500 fine, with credit for time served. The court emphasized that the plea bargaining was based on a "mutually satisfactory disposition" agreed upon by all parties, and the accused's presumption of innocence regarding the charged offense was preserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts