Government of Gujarat vs RUTVIKBHAI JITUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - C M GAMIT — 900/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009752026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
900/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
900/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004253179
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RUTVIKBHAI JITUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - C M GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of drugs) for selling adulterated medicine, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days. The court exercised leniency considering the accused's poverty, dependent family, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, while emphasizing that the offense was committed due to negligence rather than intent to harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of drugs) for selling adulterated medicine, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days. The court exercised leniency considering the accused's poverty, dependent family, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, while emphasizing that the offense was committed due to negligence rather than intent to harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts