Government of Gujarat vs PARTHBHAI ASHVINBHAI VEKARIYA Advocate - R M AHIR — 898/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009732026

Filing Number

898/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

898/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252896

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARTHBHAI ASHVINBHAI VEKARIYA Advocate - R M AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of medicine) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days. The court considered the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law while imposing lenient punishment, balancing justice with reform objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 898/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of medicine) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days. The court considered the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law while imposing lenient punishment, balancing justice with reform objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case