Government of Gujarat vs KARUNKUMAR NAVINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - C M GAMIT — 896/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009712026

Filing Number

896/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

896/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252875

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARUNKUMAR NAVINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - C M GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, permitting conviction without admission of guilt (similar to an "Alford plea"). The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment already served and imposed a ₹500 fine, while allowing the accused to maintain innocence regarding the charges under IPC Section 376(1)(b), considering the socio-economic nature of the crime and absence of victim injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 896/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, permitting conviction without admission of guilt (similar to an "Alford plea"). The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment already served and imposed a ₹500 fine, while allowing the accused to maintain innocence regarding the charges under IPC Section 376(1)(b), considering the socio-economic nature of the crime and absence of victim injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case