Government of Gujarat vs UMESHBHAI RUMASHIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G V VASAVA — 890/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
890/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
890/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004252842
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
UMESHBHAI RUMASHIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G V VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Surat First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with six days simple imprisonment as alternative, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors while maintaining the law's deterrent purpose. The court emphasized rehabilitation over punishment, noting that the accused committed the offense inadvertently and should be given an opportunity to reform and reintegrate into society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Surat First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with six days simple imprisonment as alternative, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors while maintaining the law's deterrent purpose. The court emphasized rehabilitation over punishment, noting that the accused committed the offense inadvertently and should be given an opportunity to reform and reintegrate into society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts