Government of Gujarat vs MOHMAD MINAJ HANIF SHEKH Advocate - D S GAMIT — 876/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009512026

Filing Number

876/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

876/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253052

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHMAD MINAJ HANIF SHEKH Advocate - D S GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court approved the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to be acquitted while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500, considering his conduct, age, and socioeconomic circumstances. The judgment explores the feasibility of adopting "Alford plea" and "nolo contendere" practices within India's existing plea bargaining framework to enable mutually satisfactory dispositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 876/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to be acquitted while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to six months imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500, considering his conduct, age, and socioeconomic circumstances. The judgment explores the feasibility of adopting "Alford plea" and "nolo contendere" practices within India's existing plea bargaining framework to enable mutually satisfactory dispositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case