Government of Gujarat vs MANISHBHAI CHIMANBHAI GAMIT — 871/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009462026

Filing Number

871/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

871/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253023

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHBHAI CHIMANBHAI GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of provisions) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with a default imprisonment of 6 days. The judgment emphasized reformative justice, noting the accused's poverty and family responsibilities, and imposed a lenient sentence aligned with the law's rehabilitative objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 871/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of provisions) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with a default imprisonment of 6 days. The judgment emphasized reformative justice, noting the accused's poverty and family responsibilities, and imposed a lenient sentence aligned with the law's rehabilitative objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case