Government of Gujarat vs PARESHBHAI DINESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - J L GIRASE — 870/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009452026

Filing Number

870/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

870/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253047

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARESHBHAI DINESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - J L GIRASE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing the accused to maintain innocence while consenting to conviction in exchange for reduced punishment (₹500 fine and release). The court found the case suitable for plea bargaining as it involved no victim and no minor children, and was not listed as a heinous crime under central government notification S.O. 1042(E) of 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 870/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing the accused to maintain innocence while consenting to conviction in exchange for reduced punishment (₹500 fine and release). The court found the case suitable for plea bargaining as it involved no victim and no minor children, and was not listed as a heinous crime under central government notification S.O. 1042(E) of 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case