Government of Gujarat vs SHANTUBHAI NAGINBHAI RATHOD Advocate - G V VASAVA — 857/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

857/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

857/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253230

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHANTUBHAI NAGINBHAI RATHOD Advocate - G V VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for illegal possession of liquor, finding the guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative six-day simple imprisonment, showing leniency due to the accused's poverty, dependent family status, and the reformative objective of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for illegal possession of liquor, finding the guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative six-day simple imprisonment, showing leniency due to the accused's poverty, dependent family status, and the reformative objective of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case