Government of Gujarat vs HEMANTBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT — 849/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060009242026
Filing Number
849/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
849/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004253135
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HEMANTBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting to the crime while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, considering his good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while exploring the feasibility of incorporating "Alford plea" principles (as recognized in US law) into Indian criminal procedure to allow accused persons to consent to conviction without conceding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 849/2026
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting to the crime while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, considering his good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while exploring the feasibility of incorporating "Alford plea" principles (as recognized in US law) into Indian criminal procedure to allow accused persons to consent to conviction without conceding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts