Government of Gujarat vs HEMANTBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT — 849/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009242026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

849/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

849/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253135

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HEMANTBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting to the crime while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, considering his good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while exploring the feasibility of incorporating "Alford plea" principles (as recognized in US law) into Indian criminal procedure to allow accused persons to consent to conviction without conceding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining application under CrPC Section 265C, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting to the crime while maintaining his innocence. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and a fine of ₹500, considering his good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while exploring the feasibility of incorporating "Alford plea" principles (as recognized in US law) into Indian criminal procedure to allow accused persons to consent to conviction without conceding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case