Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI GAMIT Advocate - A A GAMIT — 848/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009232026

Filing Number

848/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

848/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253128

Police Station

UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI GAMIT Advocate - A A GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated food items. Considering the accused's poverty, family dependents, and the reformative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine, with 6 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 848/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated food items. Considering the accused's poverty, family dependents, and the reformative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine, with 6 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case