Government of Gujarat vs JIGNESHBHAI SOMABHAI GAMIT — 846/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060009212026

Filing Number

846/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

846/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004253123

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGNESHBHAI SOMABHAI GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of provisions) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated provisions. Considering the accused's poverty, family dependents, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 6 days, emphasizing reformation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 846/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of provisions) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated provisions. Considering the accused's poverty, family dependents, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a fine of ₹500 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 6 days, emphasizing reformation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case