Government of Gujarat vs RAVINDRABHAI JAYRAMBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M T GAMIT — 678/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060007452026

Filing Number

678/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

678/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824005251035

Police Station

UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRABHAI JAYRAMBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M T GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary In Criminal Case No. 678/2026 from Songarh (Gujarat), the court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) along with the sentence as per IPC Section 185. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case No. 678/2026 from Songarh (Gujarat), the court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) and IPC Section 185. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid) along with the sentence as per IPC Section 185. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case