Government of Gujarat vs ANKITBHAI VINODBHAI GAMIT Advocate - G G VASAVA — 404/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060004542026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
404/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
404/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004252470
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ANKITBHAI VINODBHAI GAMIT Advocate - G G VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated food items. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 600 with an alternative six-day simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors while maintaining the deterrent purpose of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, finding the accused guilty of selling adulterated food items. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 600 with an alternative six-day simple imprisonment, considering the accused's poor economic condition and family responsibilities as mitigating factors while maintaining the deterrent purpose of the law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts