Government of Gujarat vs ANKURBHAI VINESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - M N CHAUDHARI — 377/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060004272026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

377/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252553

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ANKURBHAI VINESHBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - M N CHAUDHARI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

17-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 275 (related to adulterating food/provisions intended for sale) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family dependents, and absence of prior criminal history as mitigating factors. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 (or six days simple imprisonment in default), emphasizing rehabilitation and reformation as the law's objective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 275 (related to adulterating food/provisions intended for sale) under the Gujarat Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family dependents, and absence of prior criminal history as mitigating factors. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹500 (or six days simple imprisonment in default), emphasizing rehabilitation and reformation as the law's objective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case