Government of Gujarat vs ROHITBHAI LAKSHMANBHAI GAMIT Advocate - R M AHIR — 317/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section નીલ. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060003622026

Filing Number

317/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

317/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004252631

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section નીલ

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHITBHAI LAKSHMANBHAI GAMIT Advocate - R M AHIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The Songarh First Class Judicial Magistrate court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) after the accused pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days if the fine remains unpaid (decided March 14, 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Songarh First Class Judicial Magistrate court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of food) after the accused pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the rehabilitative purpose of law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with an alternative imprisonment of 6 days if the fine remains unpaid (decided March 14, 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case