Government of Gujarat vs SATISHBHAI NAGINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT — 184/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP060002162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SONGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824004251928
Police Station
SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SATISHBHAI NAGINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 03-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing the accused to plead guilty without admitting to the crime (similar to an "Alford plea"), while the State conceded no further imprisonment. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 with credit for time served, considering the accused's good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while noting the crime did not fall under heinous categories and recommended exploring modified plea-bargaining frameworks incorporating guilt-neutral convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing the accused to plead guilty without admitting to the crime (similar to an "Alford plea"), while the State conceded no further imprisonment. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 with credit for time served, considering the accused's good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while noting the crime did not fall under heinous categories and recommended exploring modified plea-bargaining frameworks incorporating guilt-neutral convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts