Government of Gujarat vs SATISHBHAI NAGINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT — 184/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060002162026

Filing Number

184/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824004251928

Police Station

SONGADH POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISHBHAI NAGINBHAI GAMIT Advocate - P G GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order

    The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing the accused to plead guilty without admitting to the crime (similar to an "Alford plea"), while the State conceded no further imprisonment. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 with credit for time served, considering the accused's good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while noting the crime did not fall under heinous categories and recommended exploring modified plea-bargaining frameworks incorporating guilt-neutral convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under CrPC Section 265C, allowing the accused to plead guilty without admitting to the crime (similar to an "Alford plea"), while the State conceded no further imprisonment. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 with credit for time served, considering the accused's good conduct, age, and socio-economic circumstances, while noting the crime did not fall under heinous categories and recommended exploring modified plea-bargaining frameworks incorporating guilt-neutral convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case