Government of Gujarat vs MAHMAD KAIF MOHMAD AHMAD ANSARI Advocate - R M AHERI — 147/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060001772026

Filing Number

147/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824005251003

Police Station

UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181,177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHMAD KAIF MOHMAD AHMAD ANSARI Advocate - R M AHERI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC sections 275, 281, and various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sentenced him to a total fine of ₹700 (with 7 days simple imprisonment in default) for offenses related to improper medical practice. The court considered the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of the law in imposing a lenient sentence while ensuring justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC sections 275, 281, and various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sentenced him to a total fine of ₹700 (with 7 days simple imprisonment in default) for offenses related to improper medical practice. The court considered the accused's poor financial condition, family responsibilities, and the reformative purpose of the law in imposing a lenient sentence while ensuring justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case