Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI JESINGBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - R M AHIR — 120/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060001502026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824005250704

Police Station

UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 3,181,177,184,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BHARATBHAI JESINGBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - R M AHIR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

09-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

31-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting culpability while maintaining innocence. The court sentenced him to six months imprisonment and ₹500 fine under IPC Sections 281, 337, 338, and 3/179, with credit for time served, based on mutual agreement between the accused, prosecution, and victim considering the accused's good conduct and socio-economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the accused's plea bargaining petition under Section 265C of the CrPC, allowing him to plead guilty without admitting culpability while maintaining innocence. The court sentenced him to six months imprisonment and ₹500 fine under IPC Sections 281, 337, 338, and 3/179, with credit for time served, based on mutual agreement between the accused, prosecution, and victim considering the accused's good conduct and socio-economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case