Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI KALUSINGBHAI KATHUD — 100/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP060001262026

Filing Number

100/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

100/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SONGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824005250650

Police Station

UKAI POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181,177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI KALUSINGBHAI KATHUD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty of an offense under IPC Section 275 (counterfeiting) read with Sections 281, 3, 191, 177, and 184 of the IPC and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and showing remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹800 fine (with 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and additional fines under other sections, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty of an offense under IPC Section 275 (counterfeiting) read with Sections 281, 3, 191, 177, and 184 of the IPC and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and showing remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹800 fine (with 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and additional fines under other sections, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case