Government of Gujarat vs Jayeshbhai Arvindbhai Gamit Advocate - K I GAMIT — 1019/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP050012632025
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
1019/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
1019/2025
Registration Date
04-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824006250872
Police Station
UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayeshbhai Arvindbhai Gamit Advocate - K I GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) based on the accused's voluntary confession and police evidence. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹600, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as a first offense and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1019/2025
Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) based on the accused's voluntary confession and police evidence. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹600, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as a first offense and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts