Government of Gujarat vs Rahulbhai B haskarbhai Rawade Advocate - R N GAMIT — 1008/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP050012522025
e-Filing Number
16-10-2025
Filing Number
1008/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
1008/2025
Registration Date
03-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824006250888
Police Station
UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rahulbhai B haskarbhai Rawade Advocate - R N GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 55(1), for illegally possessing and consuming alcohol without permission. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, impoverished background, and first-time offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (in lieu of 2 days simple imprisonment) rather than the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1008/2025
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 55(1), for illegally possessing and consuming alcohol without permission. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, impoverished background, and first-time offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (in lieu of 2 days simple imprisonment) rather than the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts