Government of Gujarat vs Ravidasbhai Nileshbhai Vasava Advocate - R N GAMIT — 998/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP050012412025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-10-2025

Filing Number

998/2025

Filing Date

03-11-2025

Registration No

998/2025

Registration Date

03-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824006250772

Police Station

UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ravidasbhai Nileshbhai Vasava Advocate - R N GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

09-03-2026

PLEA

19-02-2026

PLEA

30-12-2025

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Urchal District Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2016, Section 66(1) for illegally manufacturing and possessing alcohol without a permit. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) under Section 275 BNSS, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's voluntary confession, economic hardship, and this being a first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Urchal District Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2016, Section 66(1) for illegally manufacturing and possessing alcohol without a permit. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) under Section 275 BNSS, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's voluntary confession, economic hardship, and this being a first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case