RADTIYABHAI NURYABHAI VASAVA vs SHANTIBEN NURYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - R M VALVI — 4/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP050008432023

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2023

Filing Date

01-07-2023

Registration No

4/2023

Registration Date

01-07-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

RADTIYABHAI NURYABHAI VASAVA

Adv. K S PRADHAN

MEKABEN RADTIYABHAI VASAVA

LETE NIRMALABEN RADTIYABHAI VASAVA(Legal Heir) 3.

AMITABEN SURPASINGBHAI VASAVA 3.

AMITBHAI SURPASINGBHAI VASAVA

NEMUBEN RADTIYABHAI VASAVA

SUMITABEN RADTIYABHAI VASAVA

SANGITABEN RADTIYABHAI VASAVA

Respondent(s)

SHANTIBEN NURYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - R M VALVI

RADTIBEN NURYABHAI VASAVA

LE MOGYABHAI NURYABHAI VASAVA(Legal Heir)

SHANTUBHAI NURIYABHAI VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

01-04-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

09-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

09-05-2025
ORDER
09-05-2025
ORDER

Case Summary RCS No. 04 of 2023 | Principal Civil Judge, Uchchhal | 09-05-2025 The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Mohini Taluka, Uchchhal district. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiffs' favor based on revenue records in their name, though both parties failed to conclusively prove actual possession or co-ownership status. The court directed both parties to maintain status quo (no changes to land) until final disposal of the suit, protecting the plaintiffs' presumptive rights while the ownership dispute is resolved at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary RCS No. 04 of 2023 | Principal Civil Judge, Uchchhal | 09-05-2025 The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Mohini Taluka, Uchchhal district. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiffs' favor based on revenue records in their name, though both parties failed to conclusively prove actual possession or co-ownership status. The court directed both parties to maintain status quo (no changes to land) until final disposal of the suit, protecting the plaintiffs' presumptive rights while the ownership dispute is resolved at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case