Government of Gujarat vs YAKUBBHAI VASANTBHAI GAMIT Advocate - B B VASAVA — 225/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118,315(2),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP050002512025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
225/2025
Filing Date
07-03-2025
Registration No
225/2025
Registration Date
07-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824006241005
Police Station
UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
YAKUBBHAI VASANTBHAI GAMIT Advocate - B B VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Yakubbhai Vasantbhai Gamit, of charges under IPC sections 118, 391(2), 34 and GP Act section 137, finding that the complainant's own testimony during cross-examination contradicted the case narrative and failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the main witness (the complainant) admitted the accused neither beat him, abused him, nor threatened his life, thereby undermining the prosecution's case entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Yakubbhai Vasantbhai Gamit, of charges under IPC sections 118, 391(2), 34 and GP Act section 137, finding that the complainant's own testimony during cross-examination contradicted the case narrative and failed to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the main witness (the complainant) admitted the accused neither beat him, abused him, nor threatened his life, thereby undermining the prosecution's case entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts