Government of Gujarat vs ravindra nahalya pavar Advocate - R N GAMIT — 208/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP050002332026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

208/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824006260085

Police Station

UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ravindra nahalya pavar Advocate - R N GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and submitted police documents. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹600 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days, considering the accused's economic and social circumstances as mitigating factors, and issued orders regarding the confiscated vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and submitted police documents. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹600 with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days, considering the accused's economic and social circumstances as mitigating factors, and issued orders regarding the confiscated vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case