Government of Gujarat vs Ajitbhai Bharjibhai vasava Advocate - K I GAMIT — 196/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP050002212026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

196/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824006250067

Police Station

UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajitbhai Bharjibhai vasava Advocate - K I GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 55(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act for illegally possessing and consuming alcohol without a valid permit. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, and mitigating circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment of 2 days as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 55(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act for illegally possessing and consuming alcohol without a valid permit. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, and mitigating circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment of 2 days as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case