Government of Gujarat vs Vikrambhai Vadgyabhai Vasava Advocate - R M VALVI — 186/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP050002092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824006251240

Police Station

UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vikrambhai Vadgyabhai Vasava Advocate - R M VALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikrambhai Valjyabhai under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on charges of possessing country-made liquor worth ₹800. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchas (witnesses) did not substantiate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses corroborated the evidence, and a crucial FSL certificate confirming the seized material was liquor was not produced. The court relied on Gujarat High Court precedents holding that conviction cannot be based solely on police testimony without corroborating independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikrambhai Valjyabhai under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on charges of possessing country-made liquor worth ₹800. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchas (witnesses) did not substantiate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses corroborated the evidence, and a crucial FSL certificate confirming the seized material was liquor was not produced. The court relied on Gujarat High Court precedents holding that conviction cannot be based solely on police testimony without corroborating independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case