Government of Gujarat vs Vikrambhai Vadgyabhai Vasava Advocate - R M VALVI — 186/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP050002092026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
186/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824006251240
Police Station
UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikrambhai Vadgyabhai Vasava Advocate - R M VALVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikrambhai Valjyabhai under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on charges of possessing country-made liquor worth ₹800. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchas (witnesses) did not substantiate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses corroborated the evidence, and a crucial FSL certificate confirming the seized material was liquor was not produced. The court relied on Gujarat High Court precedents holding that conviction cannot be based solely on police testimony without corroborating independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Vikrambhai Valjyabhai under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on charges of possessing country-made liquor worth ₹800. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the panchas (witnesses) did not substantiate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses corroborated the evidence, and a crucial FSL certificate confirming the seized material was liquor was not produced. The court relied on Gujarat High Court precedents holding that conviction cannot be based solely on police testimony without corroborating independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts