Government of Gujarat vs Bhimsingbhai Gopubhai Mavchi Advocate - R N GAMIT — 82/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP050000982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

82/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824006251064

Police Station

UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

Bhimsingbhai Gopubhai Mavchi Advocate - R N GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused Bhimsingh Gopubhai Mavchi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchnama (official seizure record) lacked independent corroboration, the FSL certificate on seized materials was not produced, and the case relied solely on police testimony without credible independent witnesses. Citing Gujarat High Court precedents, the court ruled that conviction cannot be based solely on interested police witnesses and that the prosecution must meet the requisite evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Bhimsingh Gopubhai Mavchi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the panchnama (official seizure record) lacked independent corroboration, the FSL certificate on seized materials was not produced, and the case relied solely on police testimony without credible independent witnesses. Citing Gujarat High Court precedents, the court ruled that conviction cannot be based solely on interested police witnesses and that the prosecution must meet the requisite evidentiary standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case