Government of Gujarat vs Dursingbhai Remabhai Gavit — 1406/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP040019062025
Filing Number
1406/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
1406/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824011250243
Police Station
KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dursingbhai Remabhai Gavit
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused Durasinghamai Ramaibai Gavlit under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that since no independent and neutral witnesses supported the prosecution's case and the complainant's evidence alone was unreliable, the accused deserved acquittal, and the confiscated liquor would be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1406/2025
The court acquitted the accused Durasinghamai Ramaibai Gavlit under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that since no independent and neutral witnesses supported the prosecution's case and the complainant's evidence alone was unreliable, the accused deserved acquittal, and the confiscated liquor would be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts