Government of Gujarat vs Prakashbhai Olyabhai Padvi — 1405/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP040019052025

Filing Number

1405/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

1405/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, NIZAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824011250242

Police Station

KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakashbhai Olyabhai Padvi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's case. The judge held that prosecution witnesses who were interested parties (police officers) could not alone establish guilt without corroborating independent evidence, and the complainant failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the accused was discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1405/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's case. The judge held that prosecution witnesses who were interested parties (police officers) could not alone establish guilt without corroborating independent evidence, and the complainant failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the accused was discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case