Government of Gujarat vs Daulatbhai Vajesing Valvi — 1404/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP040019042025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1404/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1404/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, NIZAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824011250241

Police Station

KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Daulatbhai Vajesing Valvi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary In Criminal Case 1404/2025 under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-A, the court acquitted the accused Sushilbhai Vikrambhai Vadvai of charges related to illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at ₹400. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce independent and impartial witnesses to corroborate the case, and relied solely on interested witnesses (police officers), which was insufficient for conviction. The court held that when there is no reasonable prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on procedural delays, and accordingly acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case 1404/2025 under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-A, the court acquitted the accused Sushilbhai Vikrambhai Vadvai of charges related to illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at ₹400. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce independent and impartial witnesses to corroborate the case, and relied solely on interested witnesses (police officers), which was insufficient for conviction. The court held that when there is no reasonable prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on procedural delays, and accordingly acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NIZAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case