Government of Gujarat vs Daulatbhai Vajesing Valvi — 1404/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP040019042025
Filing Number
1404/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
1404/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824011250241
Police Station
KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Daulatbhai Vajesing Valvi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary In Criminal Case 1404/2025 under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-A, the court acquitted the accused Sushilbhai Vikrambhai Vadvai of charges related to illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at ₹400. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce independent and impartial witnesses to corroborate the case, and relied solely on interested witnesses (police officers), which was insufficient for conviction. The court held that when there is no reasonable prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on procedural delays, and accordingly acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1404/2025
Summary In Criminal Case 1404/2025 under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-A, the court acquitted the accused Sushilbhai Vikrambhai Vadvai of charges related to illegal possession of 2 liters of country liquor valued at ₹400. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce independent and impartial witnesses to corroborate the case, and relied solely on interested witnesses (police officers), which was insufficient for conviction. The court held that when there is no reasonable prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on procedural delays, and accordingly acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts