Government of Gujarat vs Girishbhai Gavabhai Padvi Advocate - H B VALVI — 1403/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP040019032025
Filing Number
1403/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
1403/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824011250240
Police Station
KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Girishbhai Gavabhai Padvi Advocate - H B VALVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused (Girishbhai Ganwabhai Padwali) under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that when there is no prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on prolonged proceedings, and absent independent corroborating witness testimony supporting the prosecution, the accused is entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1403/2025
The court acquitted the accused (Girishbhai Ganwabhai Padwali) under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that when there is no prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on prolonged proceedings, and absent independent corroborating witness testimony supporting the prosecution, the accused is entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts