Government of Gujarat vs Girishbhai Gavabhai Padvi Advocate - H B VALVI — 1403/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP040019032025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1403/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1403/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, NIZAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824011250240

Police Station

KUKARMUNDA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Girishbhai Gavabhai Padvi Advocate - H B VALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

21-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

07-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

27-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused (Girishbhai Ganwabhai Padwali) under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that when there is no prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on prolonged proceedings, and absent independent corroborating witness testimony supporting the prosecution, the accused is entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused (Girishbhai Ganwabhai Padwali) under Section 65-A of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that when there is no prospect of conviction, court time should not be wasted on prolonged proceedings, and absent independent corroborating witness testimony supporting the prosecution, the accused is entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NIZAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case